Overview of the Treatment of Congestion in Heart Failure.

Heart failure is a major problem in developed countries, leading to a high number of hospitalizations and healthcare costs. The most common symptom of heart failure is congestion, which is also the primary reason for hospitalization. Diuretics, particularly loop diuretics, are the cornerstone of the treatment of congestion. Likewise, there are other types of diuretics with different pathways of action, bioavailability profiles, adverse reactions, and effects on the cardiovascular and renal systems. Moreover, in recent years, new therapeutic alternatives have been proposed for challenging cases of diuretic resistance, such as ultrafiltration through peripheral access or peritoneal dialysis. The main objective of this article is to provide a step-guided approach to the management of congestion in patients with heart failure in order to guide the medical practice. Despite the significant amount of research published in recent years, there are no clear algorithms for managing acute heart failure. Diuretics remain the primary treatment of acute heart failure, and nephron blockade is key, but new therapies are emerging, and ongoing research is needed to develop better strategies for managing this condition.

Impact of SARS-Cov-2 infection in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: results of an international multicentre registry.

AIMS: To describe the natural history of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) compared with a control group and to identify predictors of adverse events. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred and five patients [age 56.6 ± 16.9 years old, 191 (62.6%) male patients] with HCM and SARS-Cov-2 infection were enrolled. The control group consisted of 91 131 infected individuals. Endpoints were (i) SARS-CoV-2 related mortality and (ii) severe clinical course [death or intensive care unit (ICU) admission]. New onset of atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrhythmias, shock, stroke, and cardiac arrest were also recorded. Sixty-nine (22.9%) HCM patients were hospitalized for non-ICU level care, and 21 (7.0%) required ICU care. Seventeen (5.6%) died: eight (2.6%) of respiratory failure, four (1.3%) of heart failure, two (0.7%) suddenly, and three (1.0%) due to other SARS-CoV-2-related complications. Covariates associated with mortality in the multivariable were age {odds ratio (OR) per 10 year increase 2.25 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12-4.51], P = 0.0229}, baseline New York Heart Association class [OR per one-unit increase 4.01 (95%CI: 1.75-9.20), P = 0.0011], presence of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction [OR 5.59 (95%CI: 1.16-26.92), P = 0.0317], and left ventricular systolic impairment [OR 7.72 (95%CI: 1.20-49.79), P = 0.0316]. Controlling for age and sex and comparing HCM patients with a community-based SARS-CoV-2 cohort, the presence of HCM was associated with a borderline significant increased risk of mortality OR 1.70 (95%CI: 0.98-2.91, P = 0.0600). CONCLUSIONS: Over one-fourth of HCM patients infected with SARS-Cov-2 required hospitalization, including 6% in an ICU setting. Age and cardiac features related to HCM, including baseline functional class, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, and systolic impairment, conveyed increased risk of mortality.

COVID-19 in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies: Outcomes and Options for Treatments.

Patients with hematologic malignancies are particularly vulnerable to infections due to underlying humoral and cellular immune dysfunction, cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens, advanced age, and the presence of comorbid conditions. Infection from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, the causative agent of the COVID-19 pandemic, has become a leading cause of death globally and has disproportionally affected this high-risk population. Here, we review the cumulative evidence demonstrating worse outcomes for patients with hematologic malignancies when compared to patients with solid tumors and the general population. We examine risk factors shared with the general population (age, sex, comorbid conditions, and race) and those that are cancer-specific (cytotoxic chemotherapy, progressive disease, and cancer type), all of which confer an increased risk of severe COVID-19. Despite the historical exclusion of cancer patients from COVID-19 therapy trials, we review the emerging evidence that patients with hematologic malignancies benefit from specific treatments such as convalescent plasma. Although COVID-19 vaccines are significantly less effective in this patient population, encouraging results are observed in a subset of these patients after receiving a booster dose.

Impact of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose on heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction.

AIMS: Heart failure (HF) is a proinflammatory disease often associated with the onset of iron deficiency (ID). ID alters mitochondrial function, reducing the generation of cellular energy in skeletal muscle and cardiomyocytes. This study aimed to analyse the response of patients with HF to intravenous iron administration according to the type of HF: preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective, single-centre study of 565 consecutive outpatients diagnosed with HF, recruited over 5 years, who were given intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) for the treatment of ID [defined as ferritin < 100 µg/L or ferritin 100-300 µg/L with transferrin saturation (TSAT) < 20%]. Clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic parameters were analysed before and after administration. After FCM administration, overall ferritin, TSAT, and haemoglobin levels increased up to 5-fold, 1.6-fold, and 1.1-fold, respectively, relative to baseline values in HF patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction (P < 0.0001), with a greater increase in ferritin and TSAT in HFpEF patients. The left ventricular ejection fraction of the overall series improved by 8 percentage points in both types of HF (from 40% to 48%, P < 0.0001). The percentage of patients with normalization of right ventricular function increased by 6.9 points (from 74.1% to 81%) in HFpEF patients and by 6.4 points (from 53% to 59.4%) in the HFrEF subgroup (P < 0.0001). New York Heart Association functional status slightly improved, from a median of 2.4 (interquartile range, IQR: 2-2.7) to 1.9 (IQR: 1.5-2.5; P < 0.0001) after FCM in both types of HF. No changes were noted in plasma levels of liver enzymes, creatinine, or natriuretic peptide (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous iron administration appeared to improve ejection fraction and cardiac functional status in outpatients with ID and HF with both preserved and reduced ejection fraction.

Genetic Deletion of NOD1 Prevents Cardiac Ca2+ Mishandling Induced by Experimental Chronic Kidney Disease.

Risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) increases considerably as renal function declines in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 1 (NOD1) has emerged as a novel innate immune receptor involved in both CVD and CKD. Following activation, NOD1 undergoes a conformational change that allows the activation of the receptor-interacting serine/threonine protein kinase 2 (RIP2), promoting an inflammatory response. We evaluated whether the genetic deficiency of Nod1 or Rip2 in mice could prevent cardiac Ca2+ mishandling induced by sixth nephrectomy (Nx), a model of CKD. We examined intracellular Ca2+ dynamics in cardiomyocytes from Wild-type (Wt), Nod1-/- and Rip2-/- sham-operated or nephrectomized mice. Compared with Wt cardiomyocytes, Wt-Nx cells showed an impairment in the properties and kinetics of the intracellular Ca2+ transients, a reduction in both cell shortening and sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ load, together with an increase in diastolic Ca2+ leak. Cardiomyocytes from Nod1-/--Nx and Rip2-/--Nx mice showed a significant amelioration in Ca2+ mishandling without modifying the kidney impairment induced by Nx. In conclusion, Nod1 and Rip2 deficiency prevents the intracellular Ca2+ mishandling induced by experimental CKD, unveiling new innate immune targets for the development of innovative therapeutic strategies to reduce cardiac complications in patients with CKD.

Analysis of the results of HIV-1, HCV and HBV viral loads of the SEIMC External Quality Control Programme. Year 2017. / Análisis de resultados del Programa de Control de Calidad Externo SEIMC de carga viral del VIH-1, VHC y VHB. Año 2017.

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and hepatitis B (HBV) and C virus (HCV) viral load determinations are among the most relevant markers for the follow-up of patients infected with these viruses. External quality control tools are crucial to ensure the accuracy of the results obtained by microbiology laboratories. This article summarised the results obtained from the 2017 SEIMC External Quality Control Programme for HIV-1, HCV, and HBV viral loads and HCV genotyping. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the HIV-1 programme, a total of five standards were sent. One standard consisted of seronegative human plasma, while the remaining four contained plasma from three different viremic patients, in the range of 2-5 log10 copies/mL; two of these standards were identical, with the aim of determining repeatability. A significant proportion of the laboratories (35% on average) obtained values outside the accepted range (mean±0.25 log10 copies/mL), depending on the standard and on the method used for quantification. Repeatability was good, with up to 94% of laboratories reporting results within the limits (D<0.5 log10 copies/mL). The HBV and HCV programme consisted of two standards with different viral load contents. Most of the participants, 82% in the case of HCV and 87% in that of HBV, obtained all the results within the accepted range (mean±1.96 SD log10 UI/mL). CONCLUSIONS: Data from this analysis reinforce the utility of proficiency programmes to ensure the quality of the results obtained by a particular laboratory. Due to the marked interlaboratory variability observed, it is advisable to use the same method and laboratory for patient follow-up.

Analysis of the results of HIV-1, HCV and HBV viral loads of the SEIMC External Quality Control Program. Year 2018. / Análisis de resultados del Programa de Control de Calidad Externo SEIMC de carga viral del VIH-1, VHC y VHB. AÑO 2018.

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and hepatitis B (HBV) and C virus (HCV) viral load determinations are among the most relevant markers for the follow-up of patients infected with these viruses. External quality control tools are crucial to ensure the accuracy of the results obtained by microbiology laboratories. This article summarised the results obtained from the 2018 SEIMC External Quality Control Programme for HIV-1, HCV, and HBV viral loads and HCV genotyping. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the HIV-1 program, a total of five standards were sent. One standard consisted of seronegative human plasma, while the remaining four contained plasma from three different viremic patients, in the range of 2-5 log10 copies/mL; two of these standards were identical, with the aim of determining repeatability. A significant proportion of the laboratories (28% on average) obtained values outside the accepted range (mean±0.25 log10 copies/mL), depending on the standard and on the method used for quantification. Repeatability was good, with most laboratories reporting results within the limits (D<0.5 log10 copies/mL). The HBV and HCV programme consisted of two standards with different viral load contents. Most of the participants, 87% in the case of HCV and 88% in the HBV, obtained all the results within the accepted range (mean±1.96 SD log10 UI/mL). CONCLUSIONS: Data from this analysis reinforce the utility of proficiency programmes to ensure the quality of the results obtained by a particular laboratory. Due to the marked interlaboratory variability, it is advisable to use the same method and the same laboratory for patient follow-up.

Análisis de resultados del Programa de Control de Calidad Externo SEIMC de carga viral del VIH-1, VHC y VHB. Año 2017 / Analysis of the results of HIV-1, HCV and HBV viral loads of the SEIMC External Quality Control Programme. Year 2017

FUNDAMENTOS: Las determinaciones microbiológicas de la carga viral de los virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana tipo 1 (VIH-1), de la hepatitis C (VHC) y de la hepatitis B (VHB) son fundamentales para el seguimiento y control de los pacientes infectados por estos virus. Los laboratorios de microbiología disponen de herramientas que garantizan la fiabilidad de sus resultados, entre ellas se encuentran los programas de intercomparación externos, como es el Programa de Control de Calidad de la Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (SEIMC). En el presente número se muestra el análisis de resultados del Programa de Control de Calidad SEIMC de carga viral de estos virus, incluyendo el genotipado del VHC, realizado durante el año 2017. MÉTODOS Y RESULTADOS: En el control de VIH-1 se remitieron 5 estándares, de los que uno (plasma humano seronegativo) no contenía el virus, y los otros 4 consistían en plasma de 3 pacientes virémicos distintos en un intervalo de concentraciones entre 2-5 log10 copias/ml. Una parte significativa de los laboratorios obtuvo de uno a varios resultados fuera de los límites aceptables (media ± 0,25 log10 copias/ml), dependiendo del estándar y del método empleado, en promedio el 35% de los centros. La repetibilidad fue buena, y más del 94% de los laboratorios obtuvieron resultados aceptables (D < 0,5 log10 copias/ml). En los controles de VHC y VHB se remitieron 2 estándares con diferente contenido del virus. La mayor parte de los participantes, un 82% en el caso del VHC y un 87% en el del VHB, obtuvo ambos resultados dentro de los límites de la media±1,96 DE log10 UI/ml. CONCLUSIONES: Los resultados obtenidos ponen de manifiesto la utilidad de los controles externos para asegurar la calidad de los resultados analíticos. Debido a la variabilidad interlaboratorio observada, es aconsejable utilizar el mismo método y laboratorio en el seguimiento de los pacientes

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and hepatitis B (HBV) and C virus (HCV) viral load determinations are among the most relevant markers for the follow-up of patients infected with these viruses. External quality control tools are crucial to ensure the accuracy of the results obtained by microbiology laboratories. This article summarised the results obtained from the 2017 SEIMC External Quality Control Programme for HIV-1, HCV, and HBV viral loads and HCV genotyping. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the HIV-1 programme, a total of five standards were sent. One standard consisted of seronegative human plasma, while the remaining four contained plasma from three different viremic patients, in the range of 2-5 log10 copies/mL; two of these standards were identical, with the aim of determining repeatability. A significant proportion of the laboratories (35% on average) obtained values outside the accepted range (mean ± 0.25 log10 copies/mL), depending on the standard and on the method used for quantification. Repeatability was good, with up to 94% of laboratories reporting results within the limits (D < 0.5 log10 copies/mL). The HBV and HCV programme consisted of two standards with different viral load contents. Most of the participants, 82% in the case of HCV and 87% in that of HBV, obtained all the results within the accepted range (mean ± 1.96 SD log10 UI/mL). CONCLUSIONS: Data from this analysis reinforce the utility of proficiency programmes to ensure the quality of the results obtained by a particular laboratory. Due to the marked interlaboratory variability observed, it is advisable to use the same method and laboratory for patient follow-up

Análisis de resultados del Programa de Control de Calidad Externo SEIMC de carga viral del VIH-1, VHC y VHB. AÑO 2018 / Analysis of the results of HIV-1, HCV and HBV viral loads of the SEIMC External Quality Control Program. Year 2018

FUNDAMENTOS: Las determinaciones microbiológicas de la carga viral de los virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana tipo 1 (VIH-1), de la hepatitis C (VHC) y de la hepatitis B (VHB) son fundamentales para el seguimiento y control de los pacientes infectados por estos virus. Los laboratorios de microbiología disponen de herramientas que garantizan la fiabilidad de sus resultados, entre ellas se encuentran los programas de intercomparación externos, como el Programa de Control de Calidad de la Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (SEIMC). En el presente artículo se muestra el análisis de resultados del Programa de Control de Calidad SEIMC de carga viral de estos virus y el genotipado del VHC realizado durante el año 2018. MÉTODOS Y RESULTADOS: En el control de VIH-1 se remitieron 5 estándares, de los que uno (plasma humano seronegativo) no contenía el virus, y los otros 4 consistían en plasma de 3 pacientes virémicos distintos en un intervalo de concentraciones entre 2-5 log10 copias/ml. Una parte significativa de los laboratorios participantes obtuvo de uno a varios resultados fuera de los límites aceptables (media ± 0,25 log10 copias/ml), dependiendo del estándar y del método empleado, en promedio el 26% de los centros. La repetibilidad fue buena, y la mayoría de los laboratorios obtuvieron resultados aceptables (D < 0,5 log10 copias/ml). En los controles de VHC y VHB se remitieron 2 estándares con diferente contenido del virus. La mayor parte de los participantes, un 87% en el caso del VHC y un 88% en el del VHB, obtuvo ambos resultados dentro de los límites de la media ± 1,96 DE log10 UI/ml. CONCLUSIONES: Los resultados obtenidos ponen de manifiesto la utilidad de los controles externos para asegurar la calidad de los resultados analíticos. Debido a la variabilidad interlaboratorio, es aconsejable utilizar un mismo método y el mismo laboratorio en el seguimiento de los pacientes

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and hepatitis B (HBV) and C virus (HCV) viral load determinations are among the most relevant markers for the follow-up of patients infected with these viruses. External quality control tools are crucial to ensure the accuracy of the results obtained by microbiology laboratories. This article summarised the results obtained from the 2018 SEIMC External Quality Control Programme for HIV-1, HCV, and HBV viral loads and HCV genotyping. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the HIV-1 program, a total of five standards were sent. One standard consisted of seronegative human plasma, while the remaining four contained plasma from three different viremic patients, in the range of 2-5 log10 copies/mL; two of these standards were identical, with the aim of determining repeatability. A significant proportion of the laboratories (28% on average) obtained values outside the accepted range (mean ± 0.25 log10 copies/mL), depending on the standard and on the method used for quantification. Repeatability was good, with most laboratories reporting results within the limits (D < 0.5 log10 copies/mL). The HBV and HCV programme consisted of two standards with different viral load contents. Most of the participants, 87% in the case of HCV and 88% in the HBV, obtained all the results within the accepted range (mean ± 1.96 SD log10 UI/mL). CONCLUSIONS: Data from this analysis reinforce the utility of proficiency programmes to ensure the quality of the results obtained by a particular laboratory. Due to the marked interlaboratory variability, it is advisable to use the same method and the same laboratory for patient follow-up

Prediction models for voriconazole pharmacokinetics based on pharmacogenetics: AN exploratory study in a Spanish population.

Individualisation of the therapeutic strategy for the oral antifungal agent voriconazole (VCZ) is extremely important for treatment optimisation. To date, regulatory agencies include CYP2C19 as the only major pharmacogenetic (PGx) biomarker in their dosing guidelines; however, the effect of other genes might be important for VCZ dosing prediction. We developed an exploratory PGx study to identify new biomarkers related to VCZ pharmacokinetics. We first designed a 'clinical practice VCZ-AUC prediction model' based on CYP2C19 to be used as a reference model in this study. We then designed a multifactorial polygenic prediction model and found that genetic variability in FMO3, NR1I2, POR, CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 partially contributes to VCZ total area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-∞) interindividual variability, and its inclusion in VCZ AUC0-∞ prediction algorithms improves model precision. To our knowledge, there are no PGx studies specifically relating POR, FMO3 and NR1I2 polymorphisms to VCZ pharmacokinetic variability. Further research is needed in order to test the model proposed here.

Severe Hyponatremia Is Often Drug Induced: 10-Year Results of a Prospective Pharmacovigilance Program.

We conducted a prospective evaluation of drug-induced severe hyponatremia  (adverse drug reaction (ADR)) through the Prospective Pharmacovigilance Program from Laboratory Signals at Hospital over a period of 10 years. Cases of serum sodium (Na(s)) < 116 mM were recorded from July 2007 to June 2017 (first period). Also cases of Na(s) 116-122 mM were recorded from July 2012 to June 2017 (second period). Drugs were the primary cause of severe hyponatremia. The incidence rate of Na(s) < 116 mM by drugs was increased threefold over the decade. Compared with other causes of hyponatremia, patients with adverse drug reaction-serum sodium (ADR-Na(s)) in the first period were older (79 years (interquartile range (IQR) 68.6-89 vs. 65 years (IQR 48-81); P < 0.001) and were more often women (70.8% vs. 48.9% men, P < 0.001); in the second period were also older (79 years (IQR 65.3-89) vs. 63 years (IQR 46-80.6); P < 0.001) and were more often women (70% vs. 53%, P = 0.002), and ADR-Na(s) occurred more often in summer. The most frequent therapeutic groups of culprit drugs were the cardiovascular system and nervous system. The 65.3% in the first period and 71.2% in the second period of the ADR-Na(s) cases responded to hydration and had been diagnosed with hypovolemic hyponatremia.

Análisis de resultados del Programa de Control de Calidad Externo SEIMC de carga viral del VIH-1, del VHC y del VHB. Año 2016 / Analysis of the results of the SEIMC External Quality Control Programme for HIV-1, HCV, and HBV viral loads. Year 2016

FUNDAMENTOS: Las determinaciones microbiológicas de la carga viral de los virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana de tipo 1 (VIH-1), de la hepatitis C (VHC) y de la hepatitis B (VHB) son fundamentales para el seguimiento y control de los pacientes infectados por estos virus. Los laboratorios de microbiología disponen de herramientas que garantizan la fiabilidad de sus resultados; entre ellas se encuentran los programas de intercomparación externos, como el Programa de Control de Calidad de la Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (SEIMC). En este artículo se muestra el análisis de resultados del Programa de Control de Calidad SEIMC de Carga Viral de estos virus, incluyendo el genotipado del VHC, realizado durante el año 2016. Métodos y resultados: En el control del VIH-1 se remitieron 5 estándares, de los cuales uno (plasma humano seronegativo) no contenía el virus y los otros 4 consistían en plasma de 3 pacientes virémicos distintos en un intervalo de concentraciones entre 2 y 5 log10 copias/ml. Una parte considerable de los laboratorios obtuvo de uno a varios resultados fuera de los límites aceptables (media ± 0,25 log10 copias/ml), en función del estándar y del método empleado, con un término medio del 40% de los centros. En los controles de VHC y VHB se remitieron 2 estándares con diferente contenido del virus. La mayor parte de los participantes, el 86,5% en el caso del VHC y el 85,6% en el del VHB, obtuvo ambos resultados dentro de los límites de la media ± 1,96 DE log10 UI/ml. CONCLUSIONES: Los resultados obtenidos ponen de manifiesto la utilidad de los controles externos para asegurar la calidad de los resultados analíticos. Debido a la variabilidad interlaboratorio, es aconsejable utilizar el mismo método y el mismo laboratorio en el seguimiento de los pacientes. Información sobre el suplemento: Este artículo forma parte del suplemento titulado "Programa de Control de Calidad Externo SEIMC. Año 2016", que ha sido patrocinado por Roche, Vircell Microbiologists, Abbott Molecular y Francisco Soria Melguizo, S.A

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and hepatitis B (HBV) and C virus (HCV) viral load determinations are among the most important markers for the follow-up of patients infected with these viruses. Microbiology laboratories have a variety of tools to ensure the accuracy of the results obtained, including external quality control programmes such as that of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC). This article summarises the results of the 2016 SEIMC External Quality Control Programme for HIV-1, HCV, and HBV viral loads. Methods and results: In the HIV-1 programme, a total of 5 standards were sent. One standard consisted of seronegative human plasma, while the remaining 4 contained plasma from 3 different viremic patients, in the range of 2-5 log10 copies/mL. A significant proportion of the laboratories (40% on average) obtained values out of the accepted range (mean ± 0.25 log10 copies/mL), depending on the standard and on the method used for quantification. The HBV and HCV programme consisted of 2 standards with different viral load contents. Most of the participants, 86.5% in the case of HCV and 85.6% in the case of HBV, obtained results that were all within the accepted range (mean ± 1.96 SD log10 UI/mL). CONCLUSIONS: Data from this analysis reinforce the utility of proficiency programmes to ensure the quality of the results obtained by a particular laboratory. Due to the marked interlaboratory variability, it is advisable to use the same method and the same laboratory for patient follow-up. Supplement information: This article is part of a supplement entitled "SEIMC External Quality Control Programme. Year 2016", which is sponsored by Roche, Vircell Microbiologists, Abbott Molecular and Francisco Soria Melguizo, S.A

Análisis de resultados del Programa de Control de Calidad Externo de carga viral del VIH-1, del VHC y del VHB. Año 2015 / Analysis of the results of the SEIMC External Quality Assessment Scheme for HIV-1, HCV and HBV viral load 2015

Fundamentos: Las determinaciones de la carga viral de los virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana tipo 1 (VIH-1), de la hepatitis C (VHC) y de la hepatitis B (VHB) son marcadores microbiológicos fundamentales para el seguimiento y control de los pacientes infectados por estos virus. Los laboratorios de microbiología disponen de herramientas que garantizan la fiabilidad de sus resultados, entre ellas se encuentran los programas de intercomparación externos, como es el Programa de Control de Calidad de la Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (SEIMC). En el presente número se muestra el análisis de resultados del Programa de Control de Calidad SEIMC de carga viral de estos virus, incluyendo el genotipado del VHC, realizado durante el año 2015. Métodos y resultados: En el control del VIH-1 se remitieron 5 estándares, de los que 1 (plasma humano seronegativo) no contenía el virus y los otros 4 consistían en plasma de 3 pacientes virémicos distintos en un intervalo de concentraciones entre 2-5 log10 copias/ml; 2 de ellos eran idénticos, con el fin de analizar la repetibilidad. Una parte significativa de los laboratorios obtuvo de uno a varios resultados fuera de los límites aceptables (media ± 0,25 log10 copias/ml), dependiendo del estándar y del método empleado, en promedio el 26,6% de los centros. La repetibilidad fue excelente, y el 97,9% de los laboratorios obtuvo resultados aceptables (D < 0,5 log10 copias/ml). En los controles del VHC y del VHB se remitieron 2 estándares con diferente contenido del virus. La mayor parte de los participantes, un 88,5% en el caso del VHC y un 85,5% en el del VHB, obtuvo ambos resultados dentro de los límites de la media ± 1,96 DE log10 UI/ml. Conclusiones: Los resultados obtenidos ponen de manifiesto la utilidad de los controles externos para asegurar la calidad de los resultados analíticos, incluyendo la fase postanalítica. Debido a la variabilidad interlaboratorio es aconsejable utilizar un mismo método y el mismo laboratorio en el seguimiento de los pacientes (AU)

Background: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and hepatitis B (HBV) and C virus (HCV) viral load determinations are among the most relevant markers for the follow up of patients infected with these viruses. External quality assessment schemes are crucial to ensure the accuracy of results obtained by microbiology laboratories. This article summarises the results obtained in the 2015 SEIMC External Quality Assessment Scheme for HIV-1, HCV, and HBV viral loads. Methods and results: In the HIV-1 programme, a total of 5 standards were sent. One standard consisted of seronegative human plasma, while the remaining four contained plasma from three different viraemic patients, in the range of 2-5 log10 copies/mL; 2 of these standards were identical, aiming to determine repeatability. A significant proportion of the laboratories (26.6% on average) obtained values outside the accepted range (mean ± 0.25 log10 copies/mL), depending on the standard and method used for quantification. Repeatability was excellent, with up to 97.9% of laboratories reporting results within the limits (D < 0.5 log10 copies/mL). The HBV and HCV programmes consisted of two standards with different viral load contents. Most of the participants, 88.5% in the case of HCV and 85.5% in the case of HBV, obtained all results within the accepted range (mean ± 1.96 SD log10 IU/mL). Conclusions: Data from this analysis reinforce the utility of proficiency programmes to ensure the quality of the results obtained by a particular laboratory, as well as the importance of the post-analytical phase in the overall quality. Due to the notable interlaboratory variability, it is advisable to use the same method and the same laboratory for patient follow up (AU)

Parálisis braquial obstétrica: incidencia, seguimiento evolutivo y factores pronósticos / Obstetric brachial plexus palsy: incidence, monitoring of progress and prognostic factors

Introducción. La parálisis braquial obstétrica se relaciona con la distocia de hombros, y su principal factor de riesgo es la macrosomía. Su incidencia se estima entre 0,1 y 6,3 casos por 1.000 recién nacidos vivos. La mayoría de los casos se resuelve, pero puede provocar déficit funcional permanente, por lo que es de interés identificar posibles factores pronósticos. Pacientes y métodos. Estudio descriptivo de los recién nacidos con parálisis del plexo braquial obstétrica nacidos en el hospital entre los años 2011 y 2015. Se han recogido variables maternas, perinatales, obstétricas y del tipo de lesión, y se han relacionado con la posibilidad de la recuperación a los seis meses. Resultados. Se diagnosticaron 32 casos, lo que supone una incidencia del 1,44‰ de recién nacidos vivos. El 59% fueron varones, y el 37,5%, macrosómicos. La afectación más frecuente fue la lesión del plexo a nivel proximal (94%). El 44% sufrió distocia de hombros, y el 47% permaneció con secuelas al sexto mes. El antecedente de distocia de hombros se relacionó con mal pronóstico de recuperación. Conclusiones. La incidencia de parálisis braquial obstétrica se mantiene estable en los últimos años. El porcentaje de niños que presentan secuelas a los seis meses es relevante. Son necesarios estudios prospectivos para poder establecer los factores pronósticos a largo plazo de esta patología (AU)

Introduction. Obstetric brachial plexus palsy is related with shoulder dystocia, and its main risk factor is macrosomia. Its incidence is estimated to be between 0.1 and 6.3 cases per 1,000 live newborn infants. Most cases are resolved but can give rise to permanent functional deficiency, which means that there is an interest to identify possible prognostic factors. Patients and methods. We conducted a descriptive study of newborn infants with obstetric brachial plexus palsy born in our hospital between the years 2011 and 2015. Maternal, perinatal and obstetric variables, as well as the type of lesion, were collected and were related with the possibility of recovery at six months. Results. Altogether 32 cases were diagnosed, which represents an incidence of 1.44‰ of live newborn infants. 59% were males and 37.5% of them were macrosomic. The most frequent disorder was injury to the plexus at the proximal level (94%). 44% suffered from shoulder dystocia, and 47% still had sequelae at the sixth month. The antecedent of shoulder dystocia was related with a poor prognosis for recovery. Conclusions. The incidence of obstetric brachial plexus palsy has remained stable in recent years. The percentage of children who present sequelae at six months is significant. Prospective studies are needed to be able to establish the longterm prognostic factors of this pathology (AU)

[Post-traumatic femoral arteriovenous fistula, endovascular treatment]. / Fístula arteriovenosa femoral postraumática, tratamiento endovascular.

BACKGROUND: Arteriovenous fistulas secondary to gunshot wounds have been increasing due to military activities, with endovascular treatment showing better results in haemodynamically stable patients. CLINICAL CASE: A 16 year-old male with diagnosis of femoral arteriovenous fistula in the left lower extremity was admitted to general surgery for endovascular management. A procedure with stent was performed without complications, and is currently on anticoagulant and antiplatelet treatment. CONCLUSION: Arteriovenous fistulas under the inguinal region can be safely treated with endovascular treatment (embolisation or stent) on stable patients. The objective of this therapy is to close the defect between artery and vein. This is the case of a patient with great results due to endovascular treatment, decreasing complications of the surgical treatment.

[Analysis of the results of the HIV-1, HCV and HBV viral load of SEIMC External Quality Control Program. Year 2014]. / Análisis de resultados del Programa de Control de Calidad Externo de carga viral del VIH-1, del VHC y del VHB. Año 2014.

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) viral load determinations are among the most relevant markers for the follow up of patients infected with these viruses. External quality control tools are crucial to ensure the accuracy of results obtained by microbiology laboratories. This article summarizes the results obtained from the 2014 SEIMC (Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology) External Quality Control Programme for HIV-1, HCV, and HBV viral loads. In the HIV-1 program, a total of 5 standards were sent. One standard consisted in seronegative human plasma, while the remaining 4 contained plasma from 3 different viremic patients, in the range of 2-5 log10 copies/mL; 2 of these standards were identical aiming to determine repeatability. A significant proportion of the laboratories (30.8% on average) obtained values out of the accepted range (mean ± 0.25 log10 copies/mL), depending on the standard and on the method used for quantification. Repeatability was excellent, with up to 95.8% of laboratories reporting results within the limits (Δ < 0.5 log10 copies/mL). The HBV and HCV program consisted of 2 standards with different viral load contents. Most of the participants, 83.7% in the case of HCV and 87.9% in the HBV, obtained all the results within the accepted range (mean ± 1.96 standard deviations log10 IU/mL). Data from this analysis reinforce the utility of proficiency programmes to ensure the quality of the results obtained by a particular laboratory, as well as the importance of the post-analytical phase on the overall quality. Due to the remarkable interlaboratory variability, it is advisable to use the same method and the same laboratory for patient follow up.

Análisis de resultados del Programa de Control de Calidad Externo de carga viral del VIH-1, del VHC y del VHB. Año 2014 / Analysis of the results of the HIV-1, HCV and HBV viral load of SEIMC External Quality Control Program. Year 2014

Las determinaciones de la carga viral del virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana tipo 1 (VIH-1), del virus de la hepatitis C (VHC) y del virus de la hepatitis B (VHB) son marcadores microbiológicos fundamentales para el seguimiento y control de los pacientes infectados por estos virus. Los laboratorios de microbiología disponen de herramientas que garantizan la fiabilidad de sus resultados; entre ellas se encuentran los programas de intercomparación externos, como es el Programa de Control de Calidad Externo de la Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (SEIMC). En el presente número se muestra el análisis de resultados del Programa de Control de Calidad Externo SEIMC de carga viral de estos virus, incluyendo el genotipado del VHC, realizado durante el año 2014. En el control de VIH-1 se remitieron 5 estándares, de los que uno (plasma humano seronegativo) no contenía el virus y los otros 4 consistían en plasma de 3 pacientes virémicos distintos en un intervalo de concentraciones entre 2-5 log10 copias/ml. Con el fin de analizar la repetibilidad, 2 de ellos eran idénticos. Una parte significativa de los laboratorios obtuvo de uno a varios resultados fuera de los límites aceptables (media ± 0,25 log10 copias/ml), dependiendo del estándar y del método empleado: en promedio el 30,8% de los centros. La repetibilidad fue excelente y el 95,8% de los laboratorios obtuvieron resultados aceptables (Δ < 0,5 log10 copias/ml). En los controles de VHC y VHB se remitieron 2 estándares con diferente contenido del virus. La mayor parte de los participantes (un 83,7% en el caso del VHC y un 87,9% en el del VHB) obtuvo ambos resultados dentro de los límites de la media ± 1,96 desviaciones estándar log10 UI/ml. Los resultados obtenidos ponen de manifiesto la utilidad de los controles externos para asegurar la calidad de los resultados analíticos, incluyendo la fase post-analítica. Debido a la variabilidad interlaboratorio, es aconsejable utilizar un mismo método y el mismo laboratorio en el seguimiento de los pacientes

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) viral load determinations are among the most relevant markers for the follow up of patients infected with these viruses. External quality control tools are crucial to ensure the accuracy of results obtained by microbiology laboratories. This article summarizes the results obtained from the 2014 SEIMC (Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology) External Quality Control Programme for HIV-1, HCV, and HBV viral loads. In the HIV-1 program, a total of 5 standards were sent. One standard consisted in seronegative human plasma, while the remaining 4 contained plasma from 3 different viremic patients, in the range of 2-5 log10 copies/mL; 2 of these standards were identical aiming to determine repeatability. A significant proportion of the laboratories (30.8% on average) obtained values out of the accepted range (mean ± 0.25 log10 copies/ mL), depending on the standard and on the method used for quantification. Repeatability was excellent, with up to 95.8% of laboratories reporting results within the limits (Δ < 0.5 log10 copies/mL). The HBV and HCV program consisted of 2 standards with different viral load contents. Most of the participants, 83.7% in the case of HCV and 87.9% in the HBV, obtained all the results within the accepted range (mean ± 1.96 standard deviations log10 IU/mL). Data from this analysis reinforce the utility of proficiency programmes to ensure the quality of the results obtained by a particular laboratory, as well as the importance of the post-analytical phase on the overall quality. Due to the remarkable interlaboratory variability, it is advisable to use the same method and the same laboratory for patient follow up

[Analysis of the results of the HIV-1, HCV and HBV viral load of SEIMC External Quality Control Program. Year 2013]. / Análisis de resultados del Programa de Control de Calidad Externo de carga viral del VIH-1, del VHC y del VHB. Año 2013.

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and hepatitis B (HBV) and C virus (HCV) viral load determinations are among the most relevant markers for the follow up of patients infected with these viruses. External quality control tools are crucial to ensure the accuracy of results obtained by microbiology laboratories. This article summarized the results obtained from the 2013 SEIMC External Quality Control Programme for HIV-1, HCV, and HBV viral loads. In the HIV-1 program, a total of five standards were sent. One standard consisted in seronegative human plasma, while the remaining four contained plasma from three different viremic patients, in the range of 2-5 log10 copies/mL; two of these standards were identical aiming to determine repeatability. A significant proportion of the laboratories (25% on average) obtained values out of the accepted range (mean ± 0.25 log10 copies/mL), depending on the standard and on the method used for quantification. Repeatability was excellent, with up to 98.9% of laboratories reporting results within the limits (D < 0.5 log10 copies/mL). The HBV and HCV program consisted of two standards with different viral load contents. Most of the participants, 82% in the case of HCV and 78% in the HBV, obtained all the results within the accepted range (mean ± 1.96 SD log10 UI/mL). Data from this analysis reinforce the utility of proficiency programmes to ensure the quality of the results obtained by a particular laboratory, as well as the importance of the post-analytical phase on the overall quality. Due to the remarkable interlaboratory variability, it is advisable to use the same method and the same laboratory for patient follow up.

Análisis de resultados del Programa de Control de Calidad Externo de carga viral del VIH-1, del VHC y del VHB. Año 2013 / Analysis of the results of the HIV-1, HCV and HBV viral load of SEIMC External Quality Control Program. Year 2013

Las determinaciones de la carga viral de los virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana tipo 1 (VIH-1), de la hepatitis C (VHC) y de la hepatitis B (VHB) son marcadores microbiológicos fundamentales para el seguimiento y control de los pacientes infectados por estos virus. Los laboratorios de microbiología disponen de herramientas que garantizan la fiabilidad de sus resultados; entre ellas se encuentran los programas de intercomparación externos, como es el Programa de Control de Calidad de la Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (SEIMC). En el presente número se muestra el análisis de resultados del Programa de Control de Calidad SEIMC de carga viral de estos virus, incluyendo el genotipado del VHC realizado durante el año 2013. En el control del VIH-1 se remitieron 5 estándares, de los que 1 (plasma humano seronegativo) no contenía el virus, y los otros 4 consistían en plasma de 3 pacientes virémicos distintos en un intervalo de concentraciones entre 2-5 log10 copias/ml; 2 de ellos eran idénticos, con el fin de analizar la repetibilidad. Una parte significativa de los laboratorios obtuvo de uno a varios resultados fuera de los límites aceptables (media ± 0,25 log10 copias/ml) dependiendo del estándar y del método empleado, en promedio el 25% de los centros. La repetibilidad fue excelente y más del 98,9% de los laboratorios obtuvo resultados aceptables (D < 0,5 log10 copias/ml). En los controles de VHC y VHB se remitieron 2 estándares con diferente contenido del virus. La mayor parte de los participantes, alrededor del 82% en el caso del VHC y del 78% en el del VHB, obtuvo ambos resultados dentro de los límites de la media ± 1,96 DE log10 UI/ml. Los resultados obtenidos ponen de manifiesto la utilidad de los controles externos para asegurar la calidad de los resultados analíticos, incluyendo la fase postanalítica. Debido a la variabilidad interlaboratorio es aconsejable utilizar un mismo método y el mismo laboratorio en el seguimiento de los pacientes

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and hepatitis B (HBV) and C virus (HCV) viral load HCV determinations are among the most relevant markers for the follow up of patients infected with these HIV-1 viruses. External quality control tools are crucial to ensure the accuracy of results obtained by microbiology laboratories. This article summarized the results obtained from the 2013 SEIMC External Quality Control Programme for HIV-1, HCV, and HBV viral loads. In the HIV-1 program, a total of five standards were sent. One standard consisted in seronegative human plasma, while the remaining four contained plasma from three different viremic patients, in the range of 2-5 log10 copies/mL; two of these standards were identical aiming to determine repeatability. A significant proportion of the laboratories (25% on average) obtained values out of the accepted range (mean ± 0.25 log10 copies/mL), depending on the standard and on the method used for quantification. Repeatability was excellent, with up to 98.9% of laboratories reporting results within the limits (D < 0.5 log10 copies/mL). The HBV and HCV program consisted of two standards with different viral load contents. Most of the participants, 82% in the case of HCV and 78% in the HBV, obtained all the results within the accepted range (mean ± 1.96 SD log10 UI/mL). Data from this analysis reinforce the utility of proficiency programmes to ensure the quality of the results obtained by a particular laboratory, as well as the importance of the post-analytical phase on the overall quality. Due to the remarkable interlaboratory variability, it is advisable to use the same method and the same laboratory for patient follow up